Thanks for your excellent question, John. I talked to my Tech Guru, Mr. Barry Rivman, to get you an equally good answer. Here's what he said:
The similarity between an exciter and BBE's Sonic Maximizer is that both units bring high frequencies forward. However, they get there differently and are not the same.
An exciter splits off high-frequency information (harmonics) from the incoming signal,
compresses it, and then feeds it back into the original signal. The result is a perceived increase in high-frequency information without the amplification and phase shift that would occur with high-frequency EQ.
The Sonic Maximizer deals with phase (time) issues that occur when signal passes through various components of a signal chain. In essence, as signal passes through various circuits and components, high-frequency information begins to lag behind the low-frequency information—the result is a loss of clarity and transient information. Since we use HF transients to localize sound, the result of this time shift (phase) is an apparent muddying of the overall signal.
By phase-aligning high frequencies, the Maximizer appears to do the same thing as an exciter, but in actuality, what it's doing is correcting phase so you hear the high frequencies first, as you would in nature. This makes the program material sound brighter and more present.
So, the main difference is that the Maximizer isn't adding anything, rather, it's correcting phase coherency, while the exciter is adding compressed high-frequency information. So, even if you use an exciter on a particular track (vocal or acoustic guitar, for example), you'd still want to use a BBE Sonic Maximizer on your overall mix.
As an aside, Sonic Maximizers also have a bass enhancer.
What is the a difference between an exciter and a sonic maximizer?